Total unanimity: 100 % of voters support decriminalising euthanasia. Not one vote against, not one abstention from opinion. It is one of the rare absolute consensuses in the archive, and by far the gravest in subject matter.
The agreement cuts across every profile: men, women and voters with no declared gender all vote the same way, and every age bracket represented, from 18-24 to over-65, reaches the same verdict. On a subject known for dividing people, no divide appears here.
The debate is in tune with the vote, but it does not merely approve it: it sets conditions. The thread's most argued voice calls for a strict framework, with free and informed consent from the patient, confirmation by several doctors that every condition is met and controls in place, in order to prevent abuses and protect the most vulnerable.
The underlying principle is the same throughout: the right to choose when suffering becomes unbearable. One voice puts it differently, noting that life, precious as it is, should not be imposed in all circumstances, and making death a personal choice that must be respected.
Two more concrete arguments recur and attract the thread's support: decriminalisation would spare needless suffering, both for the person and for those close to them, and it would avoid botched suicides.
Unanimity does not mean the absence of debate here. Nobody disputes the principle, but everybody talks about the framework: it is the only ground on which this round could have split, and it shows the consensus is for a regulated decriminalisation, not for an unconditional right.