The world rejects the ban: 57 % vote no, and only 14 % want cars banished from cities. But 29 % have no opinion, an unusually high share that weighs almost as much as the winning camp. The question divides less than it embarrasses.
Among men the refusal is total: not a single vote for the ban. Women also reject the idea by a majority, but a third of them prefer not to decide. That is where most of the hesitation sits.
By age, 13-to-17-year-olds split exactly between refusal and no opinion, with none defending a ban. The 18-to-24 bracket reproduces the global structure: a majority against, a minority in favour, and a reserve of undecided voters.
The debate itself never got going. A single voice spoke, and did so ironically, with a jab about the smell of diesel you breathe in town. It is filed on the refusal side, yet its irony targets pollution: even the only contribution of the day declines to pick a camp outright.
That may be the round's real lesson. On a question that usually pits ecology against freedom of movement, the vote comes down clearly against a ban, but nobody turns up to argue for that refusal. Here « no » wins by self-evidence, not by demonstration.