The verdict is clear : a large majority agrees on mandatory labeling of AI-generated content, with no significant divide by gender or age group.
The 25-34, 45-54 and 55-64 age groups vote unanimously in favor, while those 65 and older show a notable share of undecided votes.
The dominant register in the debate is pragmatic : the distinction between human and AI content is becoming increasingly hard to spot. The readability argument is the most recurring one.
One voice adds nuance though : technical obligations run into their own limits, as watermarking systems can easily be circumvented. The real question may be less regulatory than ethical, asking whether authors truly own the way they used AI to produce their content.