The verdict is deadlocked: yes and no split exactly evenly, with a small share of undecided voters.
The gender gap is the sharpest fracture in the debate: men overwhelmingly reject spoiler status after a year, while women largely uphold it. The gap between the two exceeds thirty-five points.
Age groups are just as divided, with no clear pattern: some generations say yes without reservation, others say no without hesitation, and others remain split.
The voices converge on one point, however: definition and responsibility are two separate things. A spoiler may still be a spoiler in principle, but the duty to warn fades over time. What the debate is really settling is not the nature of the spoiler, but the moral obligation that comes with it.